tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4560463190032436692.post3200497206552103857..comments2024-03-01T15:09:15.362+01:00Comments on Improving Enterprise Business Process Management Systems: Explaining EA: business architecture basics 3Alexhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07571303538841911828noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4560463190032436692.post-24187782386921921872011-02-20T10:35:41.032+01:002011-02-20T10:35:41.032+01:00Thanks Bruce,
In the BA there is no "convent...Thanks Bruce,<br /><br />In the BA there is no "conventional" thinking yet, so any framework is unusual thinking.<br /><br />Considering that "conventional" EA does a great job in describing the “enterprise genotype” (a full nomenclature of enterprise artefacts or assets) and there are many techniques to evaluate the “enterprise phenotype” (a set of observable characteristics Alexhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07571303538841911828noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4560463190032436692.post-80245642295496956622011-02-19T18:35:28.941+01:002011-02-19T18:35:28.941+01:00I have been long searching for something like this...I have been long searching for something like this explanation. Unlike most architects you do not confuse "process" with "capability" or "value stream", and you put process in context at the end. I need more time to study all of this but an extremely valuable contribution. Would you say your framework is "conventional" EA/BA thinking or unusual?Brucehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11946522395352321295noreply@blogger.com