I think that both Anatoly's diagrams are anti-patterns. Previous comments gave a good explanation about the second case. Also, there are many different considerations (e.g. be ready for future changes, avoid mixing of added-value and mechanical activities, etc.) to present some work currently done by the same "person" into a set of activities.
I would like to use the first diagram as a "stress test" for BPMN - how a middle-man management can be expressed as a process. This pattern (called MMM) is an example of decentralised coordination. There are four participants who/what share the coordination: buyer(B), manufacturer (M), middle-man (MMM) and a common-sense procedure for mutual agreement (AGREE). Each participant has his/her/its own pool which contains participant's view of this process.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a59c7/a59c7372d43d2db34623b66a448c499fa1d5fa61" alt=""
From the picture, it is obvious that MMM does no useful work -- just dispatching events+data others.
Thanks,
AS
No comments:
Post a Comment