Classic WF
|
Classic BPM
|
ACM
|
Social NNN
|
EPN
|
|
template-based
|
++
|
++
|
--
|
--
|
-+
|
event-based
|
-+
|
+-
|
+-
|
-+
|
++
|
rule-based
|
++
|
++
|
+-
|
-+
|
+-
|
role-based
|
++
|
++
|
+-
|
-+
|
-+
|
information-based
|
-+
|
-+
|
+-
|
+-
|
-+
|
intelligence-based
|
-+
|
-+
|
-+
|
+-
|
--
|
community-based
|
--
|
--
|
-+
|
++
|
--
|
goal-based
|
--
|
--
|
+-
|
-+
|
--
|
instance-based
|
--
|
-+
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
interprocess (used instance-based)
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
managerial (tacit-knowledge-based)
|
--
|
-+
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
resource-based (follow the resource life-cycle)
|
--
|
-+
|
+-
|
--
|
--
|
inter-organisation
|
--
|
-+
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
state-based ??
|
??
|
??
|
??
|
??
|
??
|
A combination of some of them may provide "predictive analytics".
Ideally – like in the chess game – use must the right combination of coordination techniques in a particular case at the particular moment. But, not all process-centric tools offers all coordination techniques.
Also a related post about BPM and ACM - http://improving-bpm-systems.blogspot.com/2010/12/illustrations-for-bpm-acm-case.html.
Thanks,
AS
1 comment:
by the number of "pluses" BPM is winning :)
Post a Comment