<discussion news="What is BPM?">
http://www.linkedin.com/newsArticle?viewDiscussion=&articleID=26422661&gid=1062077
</discussion>
Agree with Ilia - terminology is needed, as well as, a BPM reference model and a few BPM reference architectures. Those (of course, commonly agreed) are the base to explain to any customer how BPM can address his/her concerns and how BPM can change his/her work for the better.
I believe this is a way to transform the current vendor-centric BPM into customer-centric BPM.
I would be happy to participate in the development of common BPM terminology (my contribution - http://improving-bpm-systems.com/terminology/business-related-terminology), BPM reference model (my contribution - http://www.osp.ru/os/2009/01/7195011/) and reference architectures.
Thanks,
AS
2009-03-16
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment