Game As A Process (GAAP) pattern illustrates the use of an independent coordination (a formal expression of the game rules) between two players in the chess game.
Thanks,
AS
InclusiveInnovation
1 hour ago
This blog complements the support web site for my book "Improving enterprise business process management systems" about BPM, SOA and EA, which has just been published (see www.improving-BPM-systems.com/book ). © Copyright 2007-present by A. Samarin. All rights reserved.
Note: General thanks to Peter Schooff ( https://www.linkedin.com/in/pschooff ) and bpm.com 1st law of BPM Each BPM vendor, each BPM ...
2 comments:
Nice diagram but why do you believe it's a pattern?
As for the chess game - the diagram doesn't have a provision for a draw by agreement which assumes a negotiation between the players.
Sure, there is no way to announce "draw" or "defeat" by a player in the diagram. I consider this functionality as a home work for curios people. Now you are obliged to do this :)
I wanted to keep clear the diagram's "main line" - an independent coordination of two players with opposite interests. Other examples are negotiations about product's price, conditions of a contract, etc. So, it is a pattern.
Post a Comment